Posted by Steve on December 18, 1999 at 14:08:24:
In Reply to: Re: Quest For Camelot was HORRIBLE. Get a song, ya know? :) [n/m] posted by Max on December 17, 1999 at 10:37:52:
: I think the poor management at Warners stepped all over it and it showed.
I agree. I don't claim to be an "insider", but I'm not stupid. There was an obvious lack of content caused presumably by studio intervention.
I hate slow that can't ryme on beat correctly and I remember (from the one time I saw the movie) there being one if not two in this movie.
Not that it didn't have it good points too. I liked the entire "King of the Forest" idea. Studios and writers that cater to studios need to cut those fucking goofball knotheads out of the stories produced for this genre. Goofy dragons are lame and I hate to break it to producers and marketing consultants, but kids think they're lame too.
That's why you can get this movie for $4.99 ($2.99 when there's a sale) at Blockbuster Video.
This was based on a novel, right? What was the original book called? I'm interested in reading the original story, sans revisions and music.
Post a Followup